GPT 5.4 + ACP + Opus
Opus Dispatch Visual System
Context routing, not blind model loyalty

Opus Dispatch
From local GPT to deep ACP handoff

This page makes the bridge visible. Simple work stays local on GPT 5.4. High-value work gets scored, packed into a tight XML prompt, dispatched through Claude Code ACP to Opus, validated, then returned clean.

Routing threshold
13+
Complex score dispatches to Opus. 9 to 12 is gray zone.
Current architecture
GPT + ACP
Daily work local. Deep work bridged into Opus through ACP.
Core templates
7
Book, framework, soul, strategy, architecture, content, custom.
Fallback chain
3 layers
GPT local first, ACP Opus second, direct paid models only if needed.

1. Animated Flow Diagram

Run the simulation and watch the system branch. Green path stays inside GPT. Red path builds context, constructs XML, spawns ACP, and brings the result back.

Mode: complex dispatch
1
User message arrives
A request lands in chat before any routing logic starts.
2
GPT 5.4 evaluates complexity
Score novelty, emotional depth, voice precision, reasoning, framework load, synthesis, ambiguity, and downside of failure.
3
Decision gate
0 to 8 stays local. 9 to 12 is gray zone. 13 to 16 dispatches.
4
Local answer on GPT
Fast path for routine ops, clear fixes, and lightweight summaries.
dispatch branch
5
Context assembly
Pull only the smallest useful context. Voice, decisions, framework notes, product docs, or source excerpts.
6
XML prompt construction
Build a self-contained prompt with context, constraints, output format, and task.
7
ACP spawn to Claude Code
OpenClaw hands the packaged prompt through ACP into Claude Code on Opus.
8
Opus processes
Deep reasoning, stronger synthesis, higher voice fidelity, cleaner structure.
9
Result returns
Output lands at save path or comes back with a concise result summary.
10
Validation
Confirm the artifact exists. Fix minor issues locally. Re-dispatch only if structure breaks.
11
Response to user
Short answer back. Path, validation state, and what was produced.
12
Cost-aware memory
GPT first by default. Opus only when the quality jump is worth the routing cost.
Ready. Current demo route: Complex request to Opus dispatch.
Dispatch path

2. Live Complexity Evaluator

Type a request. The page scores it in real time and decides whether GPT should handle it or whether the job should cross the bridge to Opus.

14
Dispatch to Opus
Est. prompt: 11.8K tokens

3. Context Assembly Visualizer

When the route goes red, these are the files the assembler considers. The page highlights what gets pulled for the selected template and current request type.

Template: book_chapter

4. Template Preview

Pick the closest template. The actual XML structure updates below, including save path, stateless reminder, and ordered context blocks.

book_chapter

When this template gets used

What it optimizes for

    
                

    Real use cases

    Each card routes the system for a real scenario. Click one. The request loads, the template switches, and the flow animates for that case.

    Selected: Write a book chapter

    Scenario outcome

    This panel shows what the active use case is proving. Keep it concrete. Why GPT here. Why Opus there.

    Strategy stack

    The model plan is not one tool. It is a routing stack. Cheap daily engine first. Deep engine second. Paid premium only when quality or reliability forces it.

    Phase 1. Current
    GPT 5.4 + Claude Code ACP Opus
    Free + free
    GPT 5.4 handles daily work locally. Claude Code ACP on Opus handles deep work through stateless dispatch. Best current value.
    • Daily work cost stays near zero
    • Deep reasoning still available
    • Needs ACP to stay alive
    Upgrade path
    Sonnet via OpenRouter + Opus ACP
    $50 to $80/mo
    Move daily work from GPT to Sonnet through OpenRouter if GPT quality starts costing more time than it saves. Keep Opus ACP for heavy synthesis.
    • Better everyday writing and coding quality
    • Still keeps deep work on ACP Opus
    • Adds monthly cost but controlled
    Premium path
    Direct Anthropic API Sonnet + Opus on demand
    $100 to $300+/mo
    Use direct API access when reliability, throughput, or ACP fragility becomes a real blocker. Highest cost. Highest control.
    • Best operational stability
    • Fastest premium fallback
    • Only worth it when output bottleneck is expensive

    Timeline

    This is the current plan. Not forever. Just the right move for this phase.

    Phase 1. Now
    GPT + ACP
    Default stack until GPT quality clearly becomes the bottleneck. Optimize routing discipline first. Avoid buying premium before the free stack is fully exploited.
    Phase 2. Triggered only if needed
    Sonnet + ACP
    Upgrade daily engine only if GPT misses too often on tone, reasoning, or coding quality. Keep ACP Opus for deep work until a stronger reason appears.

    Risk matrix

    This is where the stack can break. The point is not fear. The point is having a clean fallback before the break happens.

    Risk Impact What breaks Fallback move
    Anthropic closes ACP access High Deep dispatch path disappears. Opus bridge stops. Move deep work to direct Anthropic API or Claude subscription flow if still possible.
    OpenAI changes Codex OAuth or GPT access Medium Daily local engine quality or access shifts. Shift daily work to Sonnet via OpenRouter fast.
    OpenRouter reliability degrades Medium Phase 2 daily engine becomes unstable. Route high-value work to direct APIs only. Keep local free stack for trivial jobs.
    OAuth tokens expire silently Moderate Sudden auth failures across providers. Track token status and refresh windows in dashboard status tab.

    Decision criteria for upgrading to Phase 2

    Upgrade only when the free stack costs more in missed quality than the paid stack costs in cash.

    Quality misses

    GPT misses tone, logic, or code quality often enough that we spend real time rewriting.

    Throughput pressure

    Daily workload grows and local GPT quality becomes the pacing constraint.

    Revenue sensitivity

    More outputs become client-facing, public, or directly tied to revenue and trust.

    Fallback fragility

    ACP feels too fragile and paid direct access becomes worth the insurance premium.

    Monthly breakdown by strategy

    Not fake precision. Useful ranges. Enough to compare the stack against output quality and revenue leverage.

    Strategy Monthly cost Output quality Speed Best use

    Token usage estimates

    Based on current patterns. Heavy local work every day. Dispatch only for high-value jobs. Paid premium stays conditional.

    Daily local work

    400K to 1.2M
    Mostly operational prompts, quick writing, coding fixes, summaries, and routing logic.

    Deep dispatch prompts

    8K to 18K
    Curated context per dispatch. Tight excerpts. No whole-file dumping.

    Deep output return

    3K to 12K
    Long-form writing, framework memos, architecture specs, and analysis artifacts.

    ROI view

    Cost only matters in relation to the value the system creates.

    Cost vs output vs revenue
    • Phase 1 is absurdly high ROI if it already improves execution, consistency, and speed.
    • Phase 2 only needs a small quality uplift to justify $50 to $80 per month.
    • Premium direct API access is easy to justify if it removes a bottleneck tied to clients, launches, or content production.
    If Siera helps close 1 coaching client at €16K, the API cost pays for itself 30x over.

    Current system status

    Operational snapshot. Which model is live. Whether ACP is healthy. What the fallback order is. Which credentials look stable.

    Current model

    GPT 5.4
    Active local engine for daily work. Default route stays here until complexity threshold gets crossed.
    Active Local

    ACP status

    Healthy
    Last test result: dispatch path reachable, Claude Code ACP handoff working, response return intact.
    Last test: pass Deep work ready

    Fallback chain

    Ordered by cost discipline first, then depth, then paid stability.

    1
    GPT 5.4 local
    Default for routine tasks, ops, small writing jobs, and tool-driven fixes.
    2
    Claude Code ACP on Opus
    Used for deep framework work, voice-sensitive writing, strategic synthesis, and heavy analysis.
    3
    Sonnet via OpenRouter or direct Anthropic API
    Paid fallback when local quality misses too often or ACP reliability becomes the constraint.

    Credentials snapshot

    Simple operational view. Active versus watch closely.

    OpenAI / Codex OAuthActive
    Claude Max / ACP pathActive
    OpenRouter tokenOptional fallback
    Anthropic direct APIOnly for premium path